ON FARM GRAIN PICK-UP AVAILBLE

 
Printable Page Headline News   Return to Menu - Page 1 2 3 5 6 7 8 13
 
 
Sluggish Pace of Confirmations Vexes WH10/25 06:11

   

   WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Senate's willingness to confirm a president's 
nominees took a downward turn during Donald Trump's first year in office. And 
it has only gotten worse for President Joe Biden.

   About 36% of Biden's nominees have been confirmed so far in the evenly 
divided Senate, a deterioration from the paltry 38% success rate that Trump saw 
at the same stage of his presidency. Their predecessors, Presidents George W. 
Bush and Barack Obama, both saw about two-thirds of their nominees confirmed 
through Oct. 21, according to tracking by the Partnership for Public Service.

   The trend is alarming to good government advocates, who say Washington's 
ability to meet mounting challenges is being undermined by gaps in leadership. 
But the slow-walking shows no signs of letting up as senators place holds on a 
wide swath of nominees to gain leverage and attract public attention.

   Among the most notable examples:

   --Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, has placed holds on several State and Treasury 
nominees over a pipeline that will carry natural gas from Russia to Germany. He 
wants the Biden administration to implement sanctions to stop it.

   --Sen. Rick Scott, R-Fla., had placed holds on all Department of Homeland 
Security nominees until Vice President Kamala Harris visited the U.S.-Mexico 
border.

   --Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., said he will not consent to the nomination of any 
Defense or State Department nominees until the secretaries of those departments 
resign for the troubled withdrawal from Afghanistan.

   The holds don't prevent nominees from being confirmed, but they force extra 
steps in a Senate that already moves at a leisurely pace. The backup burns 
through time on the Senate calendar and forces Senate Majority Leader Chuck 
Schumer to make tough choices about what will see a vote.

   While gridlock isn't new, the struggle to staff administrations is getting 
worse. During the first nine months of the Bush and Obama administrations, the 
Senate required fewer than 10% of their nominees to advance through 
time-hogging cloture votes aimed at limiting debate. But Democrats increased 
that to 40% under Trump. Republicans have responded in kind, ramping it up to 
more than 50% under Biden, according to White House data.

   White House press secretary Jen Psaki said there have been "unprecedented 
delays, obstruction, holds on qualified individuals from Republicans in the 
Senate." And that, she said, is thwarting the confirmation of ambassadors and 
economic and national security officials.

   "The blame is clear," Psaki said. "It is frustrating."

   Holds tell only part of the story, though. The number of positions requiring 
Senate confirmation keeps growing -- from fewer than 800 when Dwight Eisenhower 
was president to more than 1,200 now. That means more competition for the 
Senate's time and attention.

   "Our system is broken," said Max Stier, the CEO of the Partnership for 
Public Service. "We have a Senate that was designed for a different era, the 
equivalent of the country road and the world around it has become a major urban 
center and it can't manage the traffic that is now trying to go down it."

   Stier's organization provides information and training aimed at making 
government employees more effective. He said delays in filling key government 
posts make it harder to respond to problems such as the pandemic, the economic 
fallout that came from it, climate change and foreign threats such as those 
from China, Russia and North Korea.

   "We face an extraordinary set of challenges and our government is our one 
tool as a society to deal with these big problems," Stier said.

   His organization recommends that Congress reduce the number of positions 
requiring Senate confirmation and give nominees a quicker vote.

   "There are legitimate reasons why the Senate would reject a nominee," Stier 
said. "But the key point here is they ought to be giving them the up-and-down 
vote fast -- not what is happening now."

   Senators seem unlikely to relent. Holding up a nominee is a rare chance to 
gain the administration's attention and perhaps change its course of action. At 
other times, it gives them an opportunity to make a statement that resonates 
with their party's voters.

   Cruz has been a longtime opponent of the Nord Stream 2 pipeline, which he 
says will increase Europe's reliance on Russia for its energy. The Biden 
administration imposed sanctions on Russian companies and ships for their work 
on the project, but opted not to punish the German company overseeing it.

   Cruz's office said the senator is committed to using whatever leverage he 
has to force "mandatory sanctions."

   "He believes that those sanctions can still prevent Nord Stream 2 from 
coming online and that the Biden administration can be convinced to implement 
them," Cruz's office said.

   Hawley, meanwhile, has demanded that Secretary of State Antony Blinken and 
Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin resign because of the "botched Afghanistan 
withdrawal."

   "Until there is accountability, the least we can do is actually vote for 
nominees to leadership positions at the State Department and Department of 
Defense," Hawley said in a statement.

   Without the holds, the nominees could be confirmed through a voice vote, a 
process taking only minutes that can be used so long as no senators object. 
That's how more than 90% of nominees were confirmed at similar stages of the 
Bush and Obama presidencies.

   There is one bright spot for Biden. He is eclipsing other presidents when it 
comes to confirming judicial nominees. The Senate has confirmed 16 district and 
circuit court judges as of Oct, 13, matching the combined total for Bush, Obama 
and Trump by that date.

   Kathryn Dunn Tenpas of the Brookings Institution noted that Obama was 
criticized for not moving quickly enough on judges. "It's clear to me the Biden 
people have learned from that mistake," she said.

   "I mean, would you rather have life-tenured people get through or would you 
have people who are going to probably stay on average for 18 to 24 months in 
these jobs?" Tenpas said.

   During the Trump presidency, it was Republicans who voiced frustration with 
Democratic tactics to slow the confirmation process. Republican leader Mitch 
McConnell, then the majority leader, led a change in the chamber's rules that 
shrank how long the chamber could debate a nominee.

   In recent weeks, McConnell has repeatedly criticized Democrats for 
dedicating so much of the Senate's time to what he described as "mid-level 
nominations." Senate Majority Whip Dick Durbin, D-Ill., scoffed at the 
criticism.

   "The reason we have to go through every step, dot every I, cross every T and 
listen to interminable speeches unrelated to the nominee is his caucus's 
decision to slow this process down," Durbin said.

   Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, said the confirmation process has been a problem 
for both parties serving in the majority "when everything is so polarized 
around here."

   "I'm hoping this is just an ugly phase," he said.

 
 
Copyright DTN. All rights reserved. Disclaimer.
Powered By DTN